US Supreme Court Strengthens Trump’s Immigration Agenda, Easing Deportations and Green Card Removals

WASHINGTON: The U.S. Supreme Court has significantly advanced the immigration policies of President Donald Trump, making it easier to remove lawful permanent residents, commonly known as green-card holders. This development follows Trump’s return to the presidency last year, during which he has pledged to intensify efforts against both legal and illegal immigration.

The court, which holds a 6-3 conservative majority, has consistently supported Trump’s immigration agenda, allowing for the deportation of individuals, including those with legal status. This week, the Supreme Court delivered three rulings that further facilitate deportations and restrict entry into the United States.

Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, remarked that the Trump administration has transformed the immigration system into a “deportation machine.” She noted that the Supreme Court has largely acted as a “rubber stamp” for Trump’s mass deportation policies.

Temporary Protected Status Under Threat

In a pivotal 6-3 ruling, the court upheld the administration’s decision to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants. TPS is a humanitarian designation that allows migrants from countries affected by conflict or disaster to live and work in the U.S. while conditions remain unsafe for their return.

Legal experts have expressed grave concerns about the implications of this ruling. Immigrants losing their TPS now face the daunting choice of remaining in the U.S. and risking detention or returning to countries plagued by violence, crime, and terrorism. Tirana Hassan, CEO of Doctors Without Borders USA, stated that the conditions in Haiti are not suitable for return.

Ahilan Arulanantham, an immigration law expert at UCLA, emphasized that the Supreme Court has consistently ruled against immigrant rights in recent years, and this decision aligns with that trend. He noted that the ruling represents a significant victory for the administration and the far-right anti-immigrant movement, which has struggled to achieve similar outcomes through Congress.

Asylum Seekers and Green Card Holders

The court also ruled in favor of the government’s authority to deny entry to asylum seekers when border officials determine that U.S.-Mexico border crossings are overburdened. This decision could allow the administration to reinstate the “metering” policy, which was previously abandoned by the Biden administration.

In another 6-3 ruling, the court made it easier to remove lawful permanent residents. The justices determined that border agents are not required to meet the high standard of “clear and convincing evidence” to refuse re-entry to green-card holders after international travel.

James Percival, General Counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, characterized these rulings as victories for “the rule of law and common sense.” He added that TPS was always intended to be a temporary measure and expressed confidence that these decisions provide additional tools for securing U.S. borders.

The Shadow Docket

These rulings have emerged from the Supreme Court’s so-called shadow docket, a process that allows justices to make significant decisions without extensive briefing or oral arguments. This has enabled the Trump administration to deport migrants to countries where they have no ties and to conduct aggressive immigration raids that may disproportionately target individuals based on race or language.

Ashley Sanchez, director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Notre Dame, noted that while immigration laws remain unchanged, the Trump administration is applying them in a manner that limits both legal and illegal immigration. The current conservative supermajority on the court has played a crucial role in shaping these rulings.

Birthright Citizenship Case Looms

As the Supreme Court approaches the end of its current term, it has yet to rule on a significant case concerning Trump’s executive order aimed at denying birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are not American citizens or legal permanent residents. This order has been challenged as inconsistent with the 14th Amendment, which has traditionally granted citizenship to nearly all individuals born on U.S. soil.

A decision on this matter could arrive as soon as Monday, further impacting the landscape of U.S. immigration policy.

As reported by www.emirates247.com.

Explore the latest digital editions of FAME Delivered in the Magazine section: https://famedelivered.com/magazine/

Published on 2026-06-26 14:59:00 • By FAME Delivered News Desk